NSA: Please Turn off the Lights When You Leave. Nothing to See Here.

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz shows how the general public can take action to truly protect their privacy using GnuPG with Evolution email. Read the details.

Mailvelope for Chrome: PGP Encrypted Email Made Easy

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz officially endorses what he deems is a truly secure, easy to use PGP email encryption program. Read the details.

Step off Microsoft's License Treadmill to FOSS Linux

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz reminds CIOs that XP Desktops destined for MS end of life support can be reprovisioned with FOSS Linux to run like brand new. Read how.

Bitcoin is NOT Money -- it's a Commodity

Linux Advocate shares news that the U.S. Treasury will treat Bitcoin as a Commodity 'Investment'. Read the details.

Google Drive Gets a Failing Grade on Privacy Protection

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz puts out a public service privacy warning. Google Drive gets a failing grade on protecting your privacy.

Email: A Fundamentally Broken System

Email needs an overhaul. Privacy must be integrated.

Opinion

Cookie Cutter Distros Don't Cut It

Opinion

The 'Linux Inside' Stigma - It's real and it's a problem.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Turn a Deaf Ear

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz reminds readers of a long ago failed petition by Mathematician Prof. Donald Knuth for stopping issuance of Software Patents.

Showing posts with label Chromebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chromebook. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Insidious Chromebook, Mega Email Preview, Smartwatches, Pirate Bay Decentralizes, CES 2014

by Dietrich Schmitz

Insidious Chromebook

Yet another major PC vendor has tossed its hat into the Chromebook ring.  Toshiba announced their very own Chromebook.  What a chuckle.  Oh, a 'Flying Chair Alert' memo has been issued at One Microsoft Way.  Be careful if you work there.  Toshiba's unit has 13 inch display, for the amazingly economical price of US$280.  What a chuckle.  I've stopped keeping count -- how many vendors are making Chromebooks now?  Enough said.



Mega Email Preview

I have attempted to reach out to Kim DotCom (born Kim Schmitz) himself in the hopes that I can have a chat with him on his views regarding Privacy.  His intent to further advocating privacy for the masses is clear: Mega Cloud ISP is now out of beta, over a year old, and provides free 50GB of Zero Knowledge Encrypted storage.  Kim DotCom continues to raise the bar and has become, despite his travails with MegaUpload, an iconic 'hero' and source of hope for obtaining true privacy on the Internet.

Most recently, news leaked onto the Internet about Mega's newest project: ZKE Encrypted Email (see screenshot below).  For those who may not grasp its significance, it is, for example, not the case that Google Gmail is encrypted.  In fact, the aged RFC specification for email doesn't even consider encryption and by virtue of its age includes defects that foster wholesale email forgery (it is child's play to insert a forged sender's email address, for example), which is why there is spam in your spam folder.  It can't be stopped without revising the specification.


A leaked screenshot of the soon-to-be-released Mega ZKE Email/Chat system

It is outrageous to contemplate that, despite the recent disclosure of the NSA having taken up camp on the inside of Google's firewall to cherry-pick the public's data (Drive, Gmail) with impunity, Google has not thus far publicly stated any intention to encrypt consumer services data.  Other ISPs, including Yahoo and Microsoft have gone on public record with statements that they intend to shore up their services with strong encryption.

On the point of ZKE, only a few cloud storage providers currently offer encryption (Mega, Wuala and SpiderOak--promulgator of ZKE and their open source ZKE developer SDK framework).  Other initiatives for encrypted email are few that support ZKE, but, most notably, Mega and SilentCircle are hot on the trail to developing a system that will ensure 100% privacy--meaning the ability to crack/decode messages will effectively become impossible.  Those following this topic will recall SilentCircle initially provided email but found the level of harassment from the government for access to be a breach of the public's privacy and so pulled the plug on that service.  Now, they have stated it will be reopened and reimplemented with ZKE in mind. 

Such luxury comes currently at a cost with, for example, Symantec Corporation (merged with PGP Corporation) providing to Corporations hosted PGP-encrypted email service.

As for the masses, the Government willingly follows 'convention' in accepting US Postal Service mailed parcels and letters in envelopes with both an expressed and implied assurance that your privacy is protected on delivery to its endpoint recipient.  Federal criminal liability is defined for any tampering with your mail even.  Yet, they have no motivation to provide the same level of expectation for privacy with your Internet email.  That stands out ever-more boldly in the backdrop of the NSA PRISM/Snowden disclosure in 2013 and punctuates all the more an unmet need to provide strong encryption on the Internet for not just commercial but consumer privacy.

In an apparent double standard, Google has feathered their own nest, by ensuring that commercial security standards are being met by providing encryption for their Google Cloud service.

Be assured, if Google take no action on this issue, I will exit using Google Gmail/Drive just as soon as Mega ZKE Email arrives.


Smart Watches

Pedestrian1: "Excuse me, Do you have the correct time?"
Pedestrian2: (Proudly brandishes his smartwatch) "Yes I can give it to you to the millisecond and in any time zone.  Oh, if you like, I can tell you the value of pi with 12 decimal places of precision!  Oh wait.  Someone is calling me on my watch."

Sound far-fetched?  Maybe a little.  But if things continue the way they are unfolding (image right: Samsung Smartwatch), we'll see the end of Swiss Watches with ruby jewel-pivot accuracy and a flood of what appear to be silicon-laden wrist watches that condense on their ASIC chipsets all manner of technology providing yet more techno-lust in a smaller, lightweight form-factor, with convergence of smart phone and any other imaginable application that can run in the current nanometer-realm.  There doesn't seem to be any constraint as memory capacity continues to increase, SSD form factor gets smaller, and ARM processors with reduced power consumption grow in power (processor arrays) and operating systems containing a Linux kernel continue to pervade all corners of our lives.


Pirate Bay Decentralizes

Let me be clear.  I am strictly against the theft of Intellectual Property or Copyrighted material.   But I do feel strongly that revision to laws on a country-by-country basis need to keep pace with the level of change occurring around us.  Real-world personal habits have changed, and technology has single-handedly changed our lives in many positive ways that could not have been imagined 50 years ago or more when the laws were originally framed and enacted.  

By virtue of how the Internet works, there is an increased desire and tendency to share.  People conduct sharing on many levels (texting, email, pictures, documents, music, video) and given how easy it can be to do, they do it often without giving any thought to the legal implications.  Generally speaking I think people know when they are doing something wrong, but I maintain, 'fair use' should come into play when doing certain kinds of sharing on the Internet.

By the same token, enforcement of laws governing IP and Copyright Ownership should not preclude consideration for if and when censorship should be applied.   Enforcement efforts have been in effect for some time.  The MPAA and RIAA have rolled out a Six Strikes and You are Out enforcement plan with the assistance of Internet Service Providers (ISP) to 'monitor' user Internet activities.  (Not all ISPs have agreed to participate in this program.  Please check with your Internet Service Provider's policy on this issue.)

This is, to my mind, wrong and smacks of a total breach to the public's right to privacy as well as an overreach of censorship.  How effective their plan has been is not clear, but many new software technologies are coming to bear to provide users with the needed tools and resources to ensure their activities remain private such as ZKE, RetroShare, Mega, Wuala and SpiderOak.

The NSA scandal of 2013 has now galvanized public awareness and catalyzed a renewal of initiatives to offer strong encryption across all Internet services for both consumer and commercial use.

The Pirate Bay has clearly been the target for long-standing IP and Copyright theft.  That cannot be disputed.  Yet, despite what happened to their founders (jailed) and what happened to MegaUpload (take down of central servers) the Pirate Bay lives on. They are now are embarking on a plan to decentralize their network to beat censorship.  At the very least, new technology that curbs inappropriate censorship is needed until the gray area between 'fair use' sharing and outright theft is clearly defined.  This is all complicated by a 'borderless' Internet which doesn't see country borders or know about treaties to offer recognition for differing treatment of existing international laws.

CES 2014

The annual Computer Electronics Show begins today, January 7 and goes through January 10.
I was an avid follower of this event going back to 2006 when many new technologies were first revealed.  In 2007 I recall the level of anticipation was palpable surrounding new technology paradigms like the Nokia N95 (I bought one) and the first generation Apple iPhone (I didn't buy one -- hate it to this very day -- Android is King).

Anyhow be tuned over the next few days for product announcements.  I'll be watching closely.

--Dietrich




Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 11, 2013

The Chromebook Juggernaut


by Dietrich Schmitz

I have to laugh.  While traditional PC sales are flagging, quite the opposite is happening to sub-$300 Notebook sales, which are growing by leaps and bounds for Google Chromebook.

Is it any wonder -- they keep opening new sales channels.

Market research done by the NPD group confirms that the Chromebook is the fastest growing segment for devices priced under $300.

Chromebooks according to NPD have garnered 20 to 25 percent of the sub-$300 Laptop U.S. market during the last eight months.

And with their newest agreements with U.S. national chain stores Walmart and Staples in place, it should be a banner year for Chromebook sales for the 'back to school' and Holiday seasons.  (Image credit: Wikipedia.org)

This Chromebook is a Juggernaut and cannot be stopped.

Mwuahahahahahah  (ah hem.  sorry.)

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Google's Chrome Packaged Apps (Local) Development Strategy

by Dietrich Schmitz

I've been watching Google's progress for some time.

We've seen most recently related technology improvements made to the Linux Kernel that specifically relate to support for software drivers and hardware on the Google Chromebook.

A few months ago, we saw the newest Pixel Chromebook arrive on the scene with superior display and other performance characteristics -- arguably as good as Apple's Retina MacBook line.

Now another adjustment to Chrome was announced in May for the official development of Google Chrome Packaged Apps.  This page explains packaged apps in further detail and includes a video.

If you watch the video which tries to explain what Packaged Apps are, Google talk euphemistically in terms which won't say we're writing local Apps, but if you read between the lines, that's really what they are doing.  Pay close attention Folks, these won't be half-baked Javscript Apps.  No, they'll be running with Native Client (NaCl) C/C++ compiled executables which are the fastest compiled code one can have driving any application.  Here's a brief text explaining what to expect when running a packaged app:

How they behave 
Packaged app pages always load locally. This allows apps to be less dependent on the network. Once a user installs an app, they have full control over the app's lifecycle. Apps open and close quickly, and the system can shut apps down at any time to improve performance. Users can fully uninstall apps. 
Without any effort on your part, your apps will launch offline. But you will need to put some effort into making sure user data is stored locally while offline and then synced back up to your data server once online (see Offline First).

You see, the Apps will be free-standing and so will run outside of the browser, but still use their fork of WebKit, called Blink, which is at the heart of Chrome.   Blink won't be recognizable after they've finished refactoring and tearing out the parts they don't want--it has been reported they already have removed over 8.8 millions lines of code.

And that's another thing they did which is beginning to make more sense.  They now can modify the WebKit code to their heart's content to satisfy both browser and packaged apps as they see fit without upstream hassles.

So, that leaves us where?

It leaves us with the proposition that Google know there is still a need for good local Desktop software, a la the days of Microsoft Windows past, only they aren't saying it.  Microsoft still have a market for Windows-based legacy x86 software which have always had the performance characteristics and the gold standard applications which so many still rely upon today and Google know they can't capture this traditional buyer's market without local Apps.  Local Apps still rule.

Initially, it seems they released a photography-driven app which comes pre-installed on the Pixel Chromebook.

And rest assured, there will be others to follow.  Applications fuel sales.  It's that simple.

With the recent disclosure of the NSA PRISM surveillance program, that leaves a major stigma attached to doing anything in the Cloud, which can potentially hinder sales of their Cloud-based Chromebook.  How long that stigma stays around remains to be seen, but, Google isn't placing all of their eggs in one basket.

Realistically, Google can go in any direction after whatever market they choose--and they usually do.  They have the know-how, cash, and have shown themselves to be quite capable at software development--innovative in fact, much to Microsoft's disliking and worry.

Can Google pull off writing a decent Office clone packaged App?  If they did, that might really send sales through the roof.  All they have to do is make up their minds to do it and it will happen, which should be one of the major concerns at One Microsoft Way.


So, watch the video above and see if you agree with my thinking.

-- Dietrich


Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

The Puzzling Case of Google Chromebook Packaged Apps

by Dietrich Schmitz

Ah, Google Chrome packaged applications.  I see.  What?!

So maybe you are as confused as I am.  Apparently, Google is, once again, on the move not sitting still, not complacent, innovating as they are wont to do and on Internet Time.

That means, a frenetic pace, which hasn't let up continues with more announcements that makes one's head spin.

The most recent is packages.  Now, you are wondering, for what are packages needed?

After all, the Chromebook's raison d'etre has been that you don't need to install any software right?

Wrong.  That appears to be changing.  And, looking just this past weekend at a Walmart $199 Acer C710 in-store display, I thought, what is a Chromebook with 1TB of disk space going to be used for?

Acer C710 Chromebook sold in U.S. Walmart stores
[Update: It was pointed out on reddit that if one drills down on the website SKU shown above and behind in 'specifications', it shows 16GB SSD; still there are other SKUs being sold with large local hard drives, so the question stands: why a large HDD?]

It also includes a blue-ray drive which will keep the movie industry happy.

But, I digress.  Packages.  What are they all about?  Well, it seems that Google Chrome is now offering packaged Apps for ChromeOS.  At least they're available to those using the developer channel for now.  And only show if you use Windows or Chromebook.  That explains me not noticing.  I usually skim through the Chrome Store once a week with my drag-net looking for trends.  The announcement came quietly.  I missed it.  I suppose because there have been so many from Google, it becomes part of the ambient Internet background noise level.

I really don't know what this portends for the future of Chromebook.  I suppose that the proof is in the pudding and those packaged Apps have yet to materialize in any major way.

Let's call it an escape hatch for Google.  They won't or can't (or both) encrypt your data on Google Drive, but you sure can keep your data safe on a local drive--far better than in the Cloud (cough NSA).  That might allay potential buyer concerns.  Local storage good.  Cloud bad.

And back to school is only a blink of an eye away in August, so, there is a yet unrealized explosion of sales to be exploited from the newest Walmart and Staples distribution channels.

The potential for sales is huge at Walmart and of course Google knows that.  And, the potential for students to adopt Chromebook is also good, but is it good enough for many who still are wanting to install apps locally?  That is Google's hedge with packages.  Really, if Google made up their mind, they could simply package ChromeOS as a free-standing Linux Distribution.  They just have to decide to do it.  For now, you get ChromeOS only on Chromebook.

Packages is not going to fly if there aren't Apps--good ones.  That will tell the tale in the long run.

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

The Insidious Nature of Chromebooks

by Dietrich Schmitz

While writers like +Ed Bott  at ZDNet would have you believe that Google's Chromebook is struggling, contradictory evidence of its pure ubiquitous nature continues to appear.

Just the other day, Google made yet another announcement in having struck a deal to sell Chromebooks in two more national chain stores.

It was heralded as a major triumph for the Chromebook to get shelf space in Best Buy roughly a year ago.  Historically, it represented the first Linux-based SKU ever to reach the 'brick and mortar' retail center's sales floor where Microsoft Windows and Apple have been historically dominant and the only two shows in town.

Gradually, and insidiously, Chromebook is finding its way into the mainstream distribution retail centers.  This is a big move, given Walmart's size (largest employer in the U.S.) and brokering power.

In addition to announcing that Chromebooks will be sold in Walmart centers nationwide, Google will also channel their product to retail space in Staples.

At the rate things are going, year 2013 will be a record for sales of Chromebooks, given that in the most recent past six new markets were established world wide.

Let's hope the momentum continues and Chromebooks will continue to spread like a contagion, but in a good way, of course.

-- Dietrich


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 10, 2013

Linux Desktop: Little Innovation, Lots of Mediocrity

by Dietrich Schmitz

Okay, I've been crossing the tundra and vast expanse of the Linux ecosystem examining, pushing, poking around in all corners.  Some of what I have seen, I like.  Some of what I have encountered is quite ugly and unseemly and not giving me anything in the way of a good feeling about the future that holds for Linux.

You see, in spite of the fact that Linux is touted as being wildly successful, there are only two Linux Distros that have had any measure of commercial success.  They are Google's Android and ChromeOS (Chromebook).

Everything else is, well, one big blotto.  Zero.  Zed. No other commercial endeavors that I can think of use Linux outside of Red Hat in the Enterprise.  I won't count SUSE because they are joined at the hip to Microsoft who leech off of sales with their interop voucher system.

But, most people don't really think about Red Hat when talking in terms of the success of Linux.  It's almost as though Red Hat is invisible.  Yet, they reign in each year over $1B dollars U.S. in sales.  Funny isn't it?

I mean, look elsewhere and really all we have to show for is the Android smartphone/tablet ecosystem.  Sure it's big, but not like the success of Windows.

Not many people view that as a Linux success, yet in technical terms it is and consumers do benefit greatly by it.

Where else?  I close my eyes and see nothing.  Just wind and tundra, some scrub bush, dust and the occasional tumbleweed.  All of the collective Distros on Distrowatch.com are doing what exactly?  Someone help me?  What?  The numbers aren't even remotely scientific.

How many in numbers are really using any of them?  How is that even measurable in accurate meaningful terms?  It really isn't measurable because unlike Windows that can be measured in quarterly sales figures, nothing gets sold in the Linux ecosystem, with exception to the Google Chromebook.

So far, there have been unconfirmed reports of actual sales volumes for the Chromebook in total across all SKUs.  Yet, Google continue to expand into six new world markets with confidence, all done with nary a mention of Linux.

That leaves most everything you see in Distrowatch doing largely nothing.  Okay we have an unspecified number of 'hobbyists' using Linux.  The guesstimates keep coming in and are just whimsical guesses--all wishful thinking  that 'maybe' Linux will succeed.

In the meantime, we see yet more cookie cutter Distros being pumped out.

Fuduntu died,  then was reborn (Halleluiah praise Jesus!) as a fork of openSUSE called confusingly, FUSE.  Then they changed the name to Cloverleaf.  Then they changed their minds about not using Consort.  We see a fork of Debian to SolydX and SolydK with the former using Xfce and the latter KDE being heralded as some kind of technical achievement (yawn).

It's the same situation on a different day--more of the same boring cloning going on and most of the original hard work is being done by only a few programmers upstream, packaged and then distributed by the downstream cloneheads who think their clones are the best thing since sliced bread.  And if you don't think so, just ask them.

It really gets tiresome to watch the same unoriginal so-called work product appear--all not the least bit innovative.  I can count only Red Hat, Fedora, Ubuntu and Debian as doing the majority of work in moving the Linux Desktop forward.

Everything else is largely a rag tag assembly of competing fiefdoms, who act surly, disrespectful, arrogant and position themselves in opportunistic ways and who won't hesitate to crawl over your back if you bend slightly to gain an advantage.  There is little sense of community spirit really.  In the end they protect their own codebases if necessary--it is simply lip service.  Community is a myth.  Not just Ubuntu, even Fedora's process is being put into question.  I use the term 'chump' for anyone working in a community project which doesn't have 100% control over their own decision making.  There are many sincere community chumps.

As a result, the Linux talent pool is dwindling and it shows.  Why write for the Linux Desktop when you can make money writing for Android, Firefox OS, Tizen, Jolla, ChromeOS, Windows, iOS, OSX?  That's what is happening.

It isn't pretty, but there it is.

--Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Google Chromebook Advances as Linux on the Desktop Spins its Wheels

by Dietrich Schmitz

It's the same situation only a different day.  Watching Distrowatch.com may be a non-scientific way to get the pulse on those Linux Distributions which are trending up or down, but it's the only method we have for gauging what is happening, unless we can measure sales reported by a commercial Distro. (Image credit: rapgenius.com)

Ubuntu, ChromeOS, and SuSE, are the only commercial Distros which are marketing Linux Desktop systems.

With the exception of Chromebook, none is doing measurably well in the U.S. market.  Neither Canonical nor SuSE Gmbh furnish sales data that can be relied upon.  Google's Chromebook on the other hand is the only real Desktop system with sales now coming from multiple OEMs and, in addtion to the U.S., is expanding into six new markets.

The developer community hasn't taken an interest in enhancing Chromium OS, the source code of which is freely downloadable.  I would have thought by now, someone would have taken the 'best parts' of Chromium OS and forked a new Distro using Google's own Aura Window Manager.

Still, Chromebook sells because, well, it is truly simple and easy to use.  And, who cares what is under the hood?  It just works.  The OEMs are quite happy to sell such devices, especially now with the newest Linux Kernel 3.9 providing full device driver support for internal/external Chromebook devices.  Only, it's the same process that Microsoft has used to work closely with OEMs on hardware certification that has made Windows historically a success.

However nice open source is, there is at present a lack of cohesion and sufficient direction.  There are many divergent conflicts of interest which pull at the fabric of the Linux ecosystem each driving its own agenda resulting in confusion.

Canonical chose to avoid upstream conflicts of interest by creating their own graphical user interface, Unity.  They have spawned a new Ubuntu Touch software branch for touch-driven devices, e.g., tablets and smartphones.  And surprisingly, Canonical sponsored development of Wayland as a replacement for X.org only to take the first iteration, version 1, and fork it to their own branch called Mir.

It seems that Canonical are once again exercising control and not chancing any upstream hindrances with work being done on Wayland, I can only surmise.  Given Canonical is privately held, there is no way to determine what their sales have been and while Dell do sell the Sputnik Laptop, this is an exotic device priced sufficiently high to yield low and narrow sales to Developers.  There simply aren't enough SKUs devoted to Ubuntu-based Desktop systems in the U.S.

SuSE Gmbh has a financial relationship with Microsoft which extends and renews the interoperability agreement negotiated by Novell's Ron Hovsepian and Microsoft's Steve Ballmer in 2006.  The most recent renewal was made in July of 2011 and SuSE received a $100 million cash infusion.  The renewal has a four-year term in which Microsoft's 'voucher system' allows sales of Windows system infrastructure to piggyback on the sales of SuSE systems.  But, that is largely for server-side business with SuSE Linux Enterprise Server and Desktop sales are negligible.

So, it's remarkable to note that however many factions and different interests there are in the Linux Desktop ecosystem, Linux on the Desktop continues to spin its wheels whilst Google Chromebook gets traction and continues to grow market share.

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta