NSA: Please Turn off the Lights When You Leave. Nothing to See Here.

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz shows how the general public can take action to truly protect their privacy using GnuPG with Evolution email. Read the details.

Mailvelope for Chrome: PGP Encrypted Email Made Easy

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz officially endorses what he deems is a truly secure, easy to use PGP email encryption program. Read the details.

Step off Microsoft's License Treadmill to FOSS Linux

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz reminds CIOs that XP Desktops destined for MS end of life support can be reprovisioned with FOSS Linux to run like brand new. Read how.

Bitcoin is NOT Money -- it's a Commodity

Linux Advocate shares news that the U.S. Treasury will treat Bitcoin as a Commodity 'Investment'. Read the details.

Google Drive Gets a Failing Grade on Privacy Protection

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz puts out a public service privacy warning. Google Drive gets a failing grade on protecting your privacy.

Email: A Fundamentally Broken System

Email needs an overhaul. Privacy must be integrated.

Opinion

Cookie Cutter Distros Don't Cut It

Opinion

The 'Linux Inside' Stigma - It's real and it's a problem.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Turn a Deaf Ear

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz reminds readers of a long ago failed petition by Mathematician Prof. Donald Knuth for stopping issuance of Software Patents.

Showing posts with label Andrew Wyatt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Wyatt. Show all posts

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Power in Numbers

by Dietrich Schmitz

We enjoy and reaps the benefits of choice.

I've been thinking about what effect choice has.  If you are using Linux then you are aware to some extent about the nature of things that set it apart from other operating systems.

Your journey in getting to the point of switching may have an interesting tale, or, you may have simply stumbled upon it in some random fashion.  Still here you are, using it.

But have you given any thought to what effect you are having in your choice to use one Distro over another?  Does the question even matter?

In thinking about all of the wonderful variation and vast array of Distros from which to choose, your selection and the combined users around the globe who have chosen the same Distro do have an effect on the dynamics behind development for your Distro.  The more popular it becomes, so too do the demands placed on Developers continue to grow correspondingly.

So, I thought when I supported Fuduntu that I was having a positive effect.  In a way I was, but then another dynamic came into play which placed Developers into a vice and resulted in a decision to 'end of life' what I still believe is a great Distro.

While I feel saddened that Fuduntu has closed it doors, I am happy for at least the choice made by its founder +Andrew Wyatt who now can resume a personal life which was consumed supporting this Distro.

It doesn't seem right to me that so much good can come from one person's efforts only to push them into a corner or create stress and unhappiness.

So, where do you go when something like this happens?  It's a good question.  Should I be more selective in which Distro I choose this time around?  What can I do to have maximal 'positive' effect in the community and benefit a larger cause and serve my own personal interests at the same time?

These questions are worth considering.  Would it be better to support one of the larger Distros or one of the commercial ones?

I submit as food for thought that endorsing a commercially-backed community Distro is the best choice.

It's the best choice because if the majority of Linux users move away from the small fledgling Distros to a small handful of larger, stable organizations, it will have a multiplier effect.

Power in numbers means that we achieve a group purpose and Developers who may have written for a smaller Distro can contribute to a focused demand for a larger Distro which has hundreds of committers and thereby reduce the burden of responsibility placed on themselves for carrying the load of work on a small Distro, as was done by +Andrew Wyatt.  He was, to a large extent, a 'one-Man Band'.  And while he is very talented, there are only so many hours in a day which get consumed.  The project ate him up, quite literally.

So, when you make the choice to use a large commercial Distro, you are widening its base, its foundation, which allows its structure to grow high like a building.  The load of shared work and responsibilities are spread more evenly across the project with hundreds of staff to do the programming at hand.

With that, I submit that we do enjoy choice but we must exercise care in doing so.  It does have an effect.  When you choose a young Distro you get limited resources and your positive effect is less felt.  

When you join and support a larger commercial Distro you help consolidate and create efficiencies as demand rises.

Thus, I have made my choice to go with Fedora 18 as it serves as the community Distro for ongoing Red Hat Enterprise Linux research and development.

Think about your choice and see if it makes sense to stay where you are.  Consider Power in Numbers. 

-- Dietrich


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, April 15, 2013

The Other Shoe Drops: Founder Announces Retirement, Fuduntu End of Life

by Dietrich Schmitz

It was only last evening that I posted my story Developer Dissatisfaction Looms with Systemd.

Sadly, following on the heels of that story, Founder +Andrew Wyatt made a formal announcement this morning regarding his planned retirement from active work on and end of life for the Fuduntu project.

It is regretful to see this happen and I hope it is not a trend for other smaller Distros to close camp in similar fashion.

The struggle to keep Linux on an even keel continues in spite of systemic infrastructural changes.

Add to the mix that Gnome has coded a forced dependency on systemd complicates the situation further insofar as non-systemd Distros that may wish to use Gnome and also obstructs the ability of continued use of Gnome on BSD platforms by virtue of the fact that systemd does not support BSD interfacing.

I ask you: Is this good programming or 'lazy' programming?  You tell me.

-- Dietrich

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Developer Dissatisfaction Looms with Systemd

by Dietrich Schmitz

Things seem to be moving along swimmingly with ongoing development surrounding systemd, at least as far as Lead Developer Lennart Poettering is concerned who has outlined the plans for moving the project forward with hopefully full upstream community participation in lock step.

Some of the dissenters have been quite vocal about having systemd 'forced' on them.  Countering that sentiment is the prevailing argument that developers don't have to use systemd.  +Fabian Scherschel opened a talkback thread regarding my Linux Advocates story Systemd: The New PulseAudio in a public Google Plus post made yesterday with this comment:

There is no controversy. Unlike PA, it was adopted when it was ready to be adopted and everybody seems to like it very much. With the exception of the Ubuntu people but that seems to be based on NIH alone. This is a completely different situation then PA.

Fuduntu Founder +Andrew Wyatt returned fire with this volley:

ConsoleKit + UDev + Syslog + DBus + Polkit + Sysinit + this + that.   RedHat Enterprise Systemd is the best product we've ever been force fed.  We are facing being forced to integrate it at Fuduntu because it's replacing so many core tools now that it's impossible to continue the project without it.
It seems fairly understandable that smaller Distro Teams are indeed resource-strapped and so cannot muster the resources to refactor their programs to by-pass the new systemd project's major structural changes.  The volume of work necessary to avoid systemd will effectively result in forcing the Developers to do just what Mr. Wyatt describes--be forced to use systemd.  I would add that the other alternative would be to 'end of life' a distribution.

That would be most unfortunate if that were to happen and the possibility of many fledgling Distros not being able to accommodate systemd to their own demise seems to be a distinct possibility.

Will a Linux Distribution 'consolidation' occur?  That remains to be seen and Linux Advocates will continue to follow this story closely.

The matter of personalities also, unfortunately, has caused some undue friction as systemd Lead Developer Lennart Poettering, also developer of PulseAudio, has a penchant for freely speaking his mind and this has been a source of conflict that might have been completely avoided had he exercised a large degree of self restraint, tact and diplomacy in making public statements.

In one such statement, Slashdot.org ran this story:

"In an interview with LinuxFr.org, Lennart Poettering speaks freely about his creations, PulseAudio, Avahi and systemd among other things. Naturally, what has stirred up most of the discussions online is Lennart's opinions on BSD. Following the recent proposal to make Gnome a Linux-exclusive desktop, Lennart explains that he thinks BSD support is holding back a lot of Free Software development. He says this while also taking a stab at Debian kFreeBSD: 'Debian kFreeBSD is a toy OS, people really shouldn't misunderstand that.'"
At this juncture, it's clear that systemd will not support kFreeBSD.  That appears to have not changed since the above story ran in 2011.

Debian's next operating system revision, is code named "Wheezy" (Debian 7.0).  An official release date has not yet been announced but the NewInWheezy page does confirm that systemd is included as an installable 'option'.

So, the tension is palpable and right under the surface is brewing dissatisfaction among the rank and file developers who must either deal a huge undertaking of refactoring code, packaging, etc., or cave in and simply implement systemd or worse simply perish.

The writing is on the wall.  Implement systemd or you are on your own, like it or not.

-- Dietrich
[Edit: 4/15/2013 9:00am GMT-5 This story just in confirms what I feared.  Fuduntu has been end of life'd.]

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Fuduntu: Back to Fundamentals, Gets it Right

by Dietrich Schmitz

I have spent several months searching for a Linux Distro that meets my requirements.  My trusty Acer Aspire One Netbook is equipped with 2 GB ram and a 160GB HDD and has served me well since its purchase in 2010 for $279 US.

The changes to Ubuntu Unity and Gnome3 set me into motion in search of a replacement Distro.  Last year I tried many Distros looking yet something was missing.  I didn't realize what it was until I tried Fuduntu in its 2013.1 version released in January.

I tried it and truthfully, I didn't expect what I found.  That name just threw me because it's not a silly Distro.  Quite the opposite, in fact, I discovered a 'sleeper'.  This product, developed by +Andrew Wyatt,  has all the earmarkings of a thorough-bred commercial grade Distro, yet is community-based managed by a small dedicated collective team who understand the 'fundamentals'.

Fundamentals.  A good word, which is descriptive of what has been missing in the Linux Desktop world.  The basics, if you will, the entire enchalada was cast aside by Canonical in their 'vision' to chart a new course with Unity.

Despite their best intentions, Canonical chose to discard 'fundamentals' and threw the baby out with the bathwater.

Unity brought its own set of features but discarded a whole raft of features found in Gnome2.  That fits my definition of regression.  The side effect of Ubuntu with Unity is seen in a series of third-party utilities, i.e., TweakUI, which is now in the Ubuntu repository to fill those feature deficits.

Fuduntu, much to my pleasant surprise opened up to a beautifully asthetically minimalistic Gnome 2.34 GUI.  Get out of town!

Fuduntu Linux 2013.1


Immediately, I felt as sense of nostalgia, harkening back to pre-Unity versions of Ubuntu.

Now, I thought, this is exactly what I need.  The fundamentals hath returned.  I was happy.

Giggly happy in fact.  Anyone in their right mind will immediately find this Distro likeable.   I mean, what's not to like?  It's familiar, functionally complete, and intuitive, yet, it doesn't over-embellish.

Okay, so you get it.  I like Fuduntu.  Lets look at some of the salient features.

tmpfs

I was at first concerned by the use of tmpfs, but haven't encountered any issues.  Essentially, /var and /tmp are mounted to a tmpfs in ram to speed up operations.  You only have log files for your current bootstrap session.  On a Netbook, this is a plus and I haven't seen a need for log rotation or viewing older logs.  To the average user, this is going to go unnoticed but does yield a performance improvement and is particularly well-suited for Atom based machines with hard disk drives (HDD vs. solid state drives SSD).

Swappiness


Swappiness is set aggressively to 10 and should yield a performance improvement in reducing the need to swap to disk, the slowest operation with any HDD equipped machine.

Jupiter


Andrew Wyatt is the author of the original and exceedingly popular Jupiter power management utility.   Users of Netbooks and Laptops alike will appreciate that Andrew chose to merge key features of Jupiter into Fuduntu--specifically power management will help keep your battery running optimally during your unplugged sessions.

Look and Feel


Fuduntu in its default configuration is minimalistic.  I like minimalism and appreciate the aesthetic chosen by the Fuduntu Team.  The default icon set is Faenza Cupertino.  I'll go out on a limb here.  It's gorgeous.


File Manager


Again Fuduntu scores high with its choice of Nautilus Elementary, a patched simplified, most-elegant version of standard bearer Nautilus File Manager component in Gnome 2.34.  Coupled with the Faenza Icon set, the result is an exceptional file manager.

VLC Media Player

Today, VLC Media Player has taken over the reigns from one-time King MPlayer and distinguishes itself as the exemplar.  A facile and most capable media player fluid in all respects, VLC comes with Fluendo's own codecs and GStreamer enhanced ongoing development support resulting in a superior multi-media experience.

Cairo Dock


I wasn't sure how I would feel about Cairo Dock, recalling its use in prior years, but I have to give this product an enthusiastic thumbs up.  Reviewing the product, I would say that it is functional, overall much improved and there when needed.  At this point, I think were I to switch to another Distro without it, I would miss it.  The integration of Compiz effects is a big plus in the aesthetic department and in the default start-up, the Desktop dock is minimally populated with just the basic applications, not over done.


Libre Office


This if not present would be a glaring omission and it has become the standard to be included in most every Distro, Libre Office.  It gets the job done.

System Tools

I was surprised at what I found on the System Tools menu.  First off, Ailurus will help you with a wide range of system settings and really is a nice utility to quickly get to some of the customizations that might otherwise require the user to get 'under the hood', as in, going to a terminal and doing some command-line wizardry.  Also found on the System Tools menu, is Deja Dup Backup, GParted, and Disk Utility, a nice graphical utility to diagnose the health of your hard drive with Smartmon.

Graphics


Not too surprising is the presence of GIMP, but also found is Shotwell Photo Manager.  I would mention that too often in other Distros, they overload the menus with redundant programs, many of which I'll never use.  I like that GIMP is included by default as I seem to recall that Ubuntu does not.

Internet

Again, Fuduntu strikes a nice minimalistic application mix, including Google's open source Chromium, Pidgin, Mozilla's Thunderbird email client, DropBox, and Remmina Remote Desktop Client.  These by themselves should cover most users' needs.  Not over done.  As for myself, I chose to download Google's Chrome web browser and XChat to stay in touch with the IRC channels.

Accessories

To my surprise, I discovered when pressing the print screen button that Fuduntu binds the key to running perhaps the best screen shot utility out there, Shutter.  Pressing PrtSc takes a shot with Shutter and opens up the application to the just taken shot.  Nicely done.  Gedit is also included and is the standard Gnome GUI programmer's editor.  Included also for terminal sessions are the popular vim and Nano text editors.

Summary


As mentioned before, I am giddy.  This modest Distro with the funny name fits the bill.  It does the job and it does it well.  The installation was clean and intuitive and more importantly easy to use.  As updates occur, you'll find a system tray update icon appear.  Fuduntu having a Fedora lineage uses rpm package management with yum.  You may opt to use the graphical package manager front end found on the System->Administration->Add/Remove Software, or, for those who prefer, drop out to a terminal and fire off a yum command which has its own accompanying man page documentation.

So, what makes this understated Distro so great?  I think that the return to fundamentals is the most sensible thing about it.  Concerns regarding the ongoing support for Gnome 2.34 are valid but Red Hat will continue to perform code maintenance through end of year 2014.  I trust well before then, Andrew Wyatt and Fuduntu Team will have set into motion a replacement GUI.  Rumor has it that he and +Ikey Doherty co-Founder of SolusOS, are collaboratively working on the soon-to-be released SolusOS 2.0 which will run with their newest fork of Gnome3, Consort.  Also rumor has it that Andrew Wyatt is planning inclusion of KDE in the Fuduntu repository.

All in all, Fuduntu strikes the right balance for me: professional, sleek, minimal, nimble.  It has the fundamentals 'down pat'.  Give Fuduntu your serious evaluation.  I promise, you won't be disappointed.

-- Dietrich







Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Linux Advocates by the Numbers

by Jonathan Hutson

statistics
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Over the last week we have been working very hard to make Linux Advocates as amazing as possible. In between strangling the rainbow juices out of unicorns and threatening cupids for enough arrows to enslave mankind we have been gathering a lot of information about what types of people are using our site.

One of the things we've looked at is what operating systems are used to view our material? After all, if it was 100% Linux,  then it would probably mean either that our work was already done, and we’d enslav.... converted the world to Linux or else it would mean we were preachers before the choirs, as it were.

Here is a breakdown of OS stats: