by Dietrich Schmitz
There are two stories I wrote last year in progression as I waded through a sea of technical information regarding systemd.
The two taken in totality paint a picture that would represent I am against systemd.
In a follow-on story, I continue my technical evaluation of the merits of systemd including cgroups.
My conclusion then and today is that systemd is, on net, a technology advancement which I accept and use today in Fedora 20.
A site has recently been using one of those stories as reference material in a campaign to boycott systemd. I do not wish to be associated with any such campaign.
Accordingly, I have taken off-line those two stories which are now inconsistent with my viewpoint.
The two taken in totality paint a picture that would represent I am against systemd.
In a follow-on story, I continue my technical evaluation of the merits of systemd including cgroups.
My conclusion then and today is that systemd is, on net, a technology advancement which I accept and use today in Fedora 20.
A site has recently been using one of those stories as reference material in a campaign to boycott systemd. I do not wish to be associated with any such campaign.
Accordingly, I have taken off-line those two stories which are now inconsistent with my viewpoint.
People can change their minds about things, and often do, as I have done.
All hail Lennart Poettering. -- Dietrich
