NSA: Please Turn off the Lights When You Leave. Nothing to See Here.

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz shows how the general public can take action to truly protect their privacy using GnuPG with Evolution email. Read the details.

Mailvelope for Chrome: PGP Encrypted Email Made Easy

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz officially endorses what he deems is a truly secure, easy to use PGP email encryption program. Read the details.

Step off Microsoft's License Treadmill to FOSS Linux

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz reminds CIOs that XP Desktops destined for MS end of life support can be reprovisioned with FOSS Linux to run like brand new. Read how.

Bitcoin is NOT Money -- it's a Commodity

Linux Advocate shares news that the U.S. Treasury will treat Bitcoin as a Commodity 'Investment'. Read the details.

Google Drive Gets a Failing Grade on Privacy Protection

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz puts out a public service privacy warning. Google Drive gets a failing grade on protecting your privacy.

Email: A Fundamentally Broken System

Email needs an overhaul. Privacy must be integrated.

Opinion

Cookie Cutter Distros Don't Cut It

Opinion

The 'Linux Inside' Stigma - It's real and it's a problem.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Turn a Deaf Ear

Linux Advocate Dietrich Schmitz reminds readers of a long ago failed petition by Mathematician Prof. Donald Knuth for stopping issuance of Software Patents.

Showing posts with label Dietrich Schmitz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dietrich Schmitz. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Linux and The Pitfalls of Tribalism

by Dietrich Schmitz



Wow.  What a title for a story eh?  

Well, sad to say, I've been thinking for a long time about this very topic and regret to report that Linux on the Desktop languishes and suffers at the hands of Tribalism to a large extent.

You see, it's really human nature at its best.  Spawned from the nucleus of base Distros (Distrowatch top 20) comes another 'newborn' clone and immediately a tribe forms around it.  The people in these tribes are assumed to conform to community principles,  sharing and working collaboratively.

The reality is often decidedly different.  In fact, I think it's accurate to say tribalism influences most everything we do.  I'm not just talking about Linux.  That may be a hard pill to swallow, but, Tribalism pervades our lives and society.

That's quite profound when you think about it.  And today, I read an excellent piece which zeroes in on this very subject and calls it what it is, How Tribalism Overrules Reason, and Makes Risky Times More Dangerous.

The author, David Ropeik, writes candidly:


Tribalism is pervasive, and it controls a lot of our behavior, readily overriding reason. Think of the inhuman things we do in the name of tribal unity. Wars are essentially, and often quite specifically, tribalism. Genocides are tribalism - wipe out the other group to keep our group safe – taken to madness. Racism that lets us feel that our tribe is better than theirs, parents who end contact with their own children when they dare marry someone of a different faith or color, denial of evolution or climate change or other basic scientific truths when they challenge tribal beliefs. What stunning evidence of the power of tribalism! (By the way, it wasn’t just geocentrist Catholics in the 16 adn 1700s who denied  evidence that the earth travels around the sun. Some Christian biblical literalists still do. So do a handful of ultra orthodox Jews and Muslims.) (...)


Yet another example is the polarized way we argue about so many issues, and the incredible irony that as we make these arguments we claim to be intelligent (smart, therefore right) yet we ignorantly close our minds to views that conflict with ours. Dan Kahan, principal researcher into the phenomenon of Cultural Cognition, has found that our views are powerfully shaped so they agree with beliefs of the groups with which we most strongly identify. His research, along with the work of others, has also found that the more challenged our views are, the more we defend them…the more dogmatic and closed-minded we become...an intellectual form of ‘circle-the-wagons, we’re under attack’ tribal unity. Talk about tribalism overruling reason
Paging the Linux Project/Community managers of the world, I reach out to them in sympathy and know how challenging their jobs can be:

Appeal to people's sensibilities: Exercise reasoned logic in setting forth your project's objectives.  Seek opinions and involvement at all levels and garner input from all participants.  Everyone's opinion is important, whatever it may be.

At times, conceptual differences may be unavoidable.  Major design changes often are a source of friction and outright opposition.  Things like systemd come to mind.  Avoid the 'us vs. them' mindset. 


There is no shortage of contentious debate centered around systemd coming from those 'Tribes' which may or may not offer sound reasons for not following in the path of the majority of Distributions to incorporate systemd.  Is your Team seeing things clearly?  Or is thinking clouded by other factors which may not have anything to do with the subject matter?  Examine what you do in these situations to avoid the pitfalls of Tribalism.

So, the next time you find yourself involved in a forum/relay chat group discussion, step back.  Take stock of the situation and have a good look at the dynamics and what is happening.  Hopefully, by making your own conscious effort in self-appraisal, you will stay within the bounds of courteous discourse and avoid thinking patterns that result in conflict and obstructions to advancing group goals.

Most importantly, be a thinker, an individualist, not a Tribalist.  Yet strive to cooperate and bridge differences.


-- Dietrich


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, January 10, 2014

Linux Advocacy: Lessons Learned in 2013

by Dietrich Schmitz

It's been nearly a year now since I created Linux Advocates.  I am reflecting on what has happened during the past year and appraising what changes I need to make that might make Linux Advocates more effective in terms of its advocacy.

As the website domain name implies, it is all about advocating for the use of Linux.  That is obvious but subtle at the same time.

In doing advocacy, I have discovered some things which have resulted in my making changes that seemingly run counter to the definition of advocacy.





Censorship


Over many years, I have learned from my personal experiences in website forums that readers come in varieties and types.  Taking feedback over the past year on Linux Advocates, I have found it necessary to apply rigid censorship so as to keep trolling from ruling the comments section.

It became quickly evident to me and LA co-founder +Katherine Noyes  that regardless of the cause, there is a sub-population who have no real interest in rational discourse on the topics at hand, who are merely intent to 'troll'.  It is unfortunate, but, part of the landscape and without censorship, I have seen comment feedback quickly regress.  So as to be effective in reigning in the trolls, full moderation has been on for over 6 months now.  Largely, the trolls have gone elsewhere.

But it leaves me with a strong impression of the types of people out there who make 'hating' and 'trolling' a game of sorts, who feel by virtue of their anonymity that they are not accountable for their bad behavior.  That is perhaps the most troubling aspect of today's Internet, along with privacy rights.

It represents a disconnect between how a 'normal' person would conduct his/herself in a public place and doing the same in a forum context.  Psychologists will be studying this type of behavior for years.

So be it.  Trolling is rampant, only I have filtered it out with censorship.  I don't like having to do it, but it is absolutely necessary.


Tribalism

In the real world, when you come to work to earn a paycheck, inevitably, there will be some 'friction' during the day due to human interaction.  Some conduct themselves in keeping with good business practices.  Others depart from that and their professional comportment and/or diminished social skills impact on others who come into contact with them.

Hopefully, you quickly identify who those people are and find ways to avoid unpleasant exchanges and get through your day.  Some days, it becomes impossible.

Personalities get in the way even more so on the Internet.  When it comes to professional conduct in the upstream software developer team setting, I have seen the worst kind of behavior one can imagine.  Even the grand poobah Linus Torvalds has been charged with exhibiting unprofessional, vulgar behavior.  

All it takes is one person in a position of 'authority' who controls a project to cause alienation to ripple downstream.  The side-effect of such behavior in the Open Source community includes arrogance and those directly affected by the individual must quickly choose sides -- either adversarial or side with the 'bad behavior' and cliques quickly form.  In psychology, the tendency to behave in cliques smooths out difficulties for the project unit but leaves the organization in a position of exhibiting tribalism towards outside developers who wish to advance a special software feature or change. 



In fact, so as to preserve the purity and sanctity of this advocacy, I have had to discharge more than one contributor by virtue of their inappropriate behavior.  It's not something I will ever tolerate from anyone.

The reputation of Linux Open Source has been given a 'black eye' by tribalism.  It is very divisive, damaging and counter-productive to advancing the cause of Linux advocacy.   I don't know what the future holds but while many upstream projects do not suffer from this malady, all it takes is one 'bad apple' to magnify and spread like a contagion.  I hope things improve.

Living

Living.  What do I mean by that?  Everybody wants the same thing: Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  Living comes at a cost.  Many currently around the globe are in the throws of economic turmoil.  And when you can't pay the rent, you are even more less likely to have any inclination to write code for an Open Source project.

That factors in for many who continue to dedicate themselves to Linux despite their life circumstances.  They are to be commended for their resolve and fidelity.  Others, simply by attrition, have either given up (Cloverleaf and SolusOS) or retired (Fuduntu).  That is the harsh reality.

I have predicted that given the serious economic turmoil, there will be a major consolidation of Linux Distributions resulting in a rapid collapse.  The result will be in the next five years only the strong will survive and that comes down to just a handful of base Distros.  And that has been a major factor influencing my decision to use Fedora -- they will be around.

Conclusion

I sincerely hope to continue providing strong advocacy for all things Linux with original and meaningful content.  I want to thank the readership for visiting my website and hope they will continue to do so throughout the 2014 year.  The average montly pageviews for 2013 was over 60,000.  

A very special thank you goes out to the Linux Advocate Contributors for their continued ongoing support.

Happy New Year Everyone,

Dietrich Schmitz
Linux Advocates, Site Owner



Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, October 28, 2013

SolusOS Sunsets as Ikey Doherty Rises

by Dietrich Schmitz


+Ikey Doherty, founder of SolusOS (image: right), wrote on his website the other day:


It is with a heavy heart that I must announce the closure of SolusOS. Simply put, there is no longer enough manpower to fulfill [sic] the vision. What began as a Debian derivative evolved into an independent distribution, without the large development team required to back such an effort.”

However difficult that decision may have been, I know that Ikey has broken through to the other side.  You see, it's been a long, long, terribly difficult life struggle for him as I gauged his progress over the last year.  Finding work, keeping his dreams alive, was almost impossible, and, at times, desperate.

Yet, somehow, he kept going and one day not long ago landed a really good full-time paying job that put his exceptional talents to good use.  If you think about it, the struggles, the frustration, all were not for naught.  Everything happens for a reason.

Ikey had to do what he 'had to do' and SolusOS was his mountain to climb, his intellectual struggle, to reach the mountain top.  It was that he maintained the struggle, fought hard for what he believes in, that kept him going and ultimately led him to his destiny.

No, I am not sad.  I am exceedingly happy for Ikey and know that he'll be taking on life's challenges and changes as he has always done -- with zest and an unparalleled joie de vivre -- straight on, dukes up and swinging -- fighting the good fight.   

This is a Man with integrity, ethics, and exceptional capability on his way up.  Step aside.  Best of Luck my Friend.

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Privacy. It's Your Right. Own It With Zero Knowledge Application Framework

by Dietrich Schmitz

It's really time to stop having our Internet Privacy rights trifled with.  And SpiderOak's new Crypton Zero Knowledge Application Framework (ZKAF) could not have come soon enough, a toolset for developers world-wide to employ in encrypted data storage applications.

The idea behind ZKAF is that a developer need not understand cryptography to write applications which need to implement ZKAF to the underlying data store's hardware.  The framework guarantees that stored data will never be accessible to anyone other than its owner who is the only authority that can unlock it.

Third parties will simply be unable to access such data without the permission of the owner.  And, the premise of Zero Knowledge is that the Cloud ISP which is providing storage service using ZKAF can prove 'plausible deniability'.

Possessing absolutely no knowledge of what is being stored on their hardware drive infrastructure relieves them from any responsibility for what gets stored and also contingent liability (recall the MegaUpload Dot Com website Government seizure).  That type of seizure cannot happen with ZKAF.

This puts third party commercial or governmental agencies at a distinct disadvantage in not having any choice but to go straight to the owner of the data requesting access.  Citizen's taking advantage of ZKAF-enabled Cloud storage can invoke their right to privacy and leave those agencies to take legal action in public court to challenge why such access should be granted.  

We used to be a country where a court ordered warrant meant something and was first obtained before a search and seizure in a citizen's home or on their private property could be performed.  With 9/11, that effectively went out the window with the Patriot Act and National Security Letter which are unconstitutional at best.

Isn't this really the way things should be?  Isn't it time for Americans to fight back and reclaim their right to privacy?

Assert guaranteed privacy in the cloud. Insist that your Cloud ISP employ ZKAF for their storage service.  Accept no other standard.

Internet Privacy.  It's your right.  Own it with ZKAF.

God Bless America.

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Google Drive Gets Failing Grade on Privacy Protection

by Dietrich Schmitz

Never mind that Google reneged on their promise to bring a native Google Drive Client to Linux.  It really doesn't matter to me at this point.  We have much bigger fish to fry.

You see, Google is as much complicit as any other ISP in cooperating with our beloved U.S. government in handing over your private data without a warrant.  The government waltzes in simply cherry picks whatever they are looking for unimpeded.

This is flouting our privacy rights and, with each successive day, more and more of our constitutional rights are being dismantled in the name of fighting terrorism.

"At what point do we stop taking away our rights?", is an open question everyone should be thinking about.  Because, the latest news regarding disclosure of the NSA's Prism project confirms just how far 'out of hand' things have progressed with the overreach by our government into our private affairs.  Seeing such news, one wonders where we will be in five years.  I fear the erosion of our rights will continue unless these projects are abandoned.

Your only recourse in fighting back to hold off these intrusions?:




Folks, I cannot stress this enough.  There is no other option if you plan on storing any personal data on the Internet other than encryption to keep prying eyes from reading it.

And, I feel obligated to tell you that NONE of your data stored in Gmail or Google Drive is encrypted.

In fact, Google will not offer an encryption service in the interest of protecting your privacy.  Why?  Because, it will render their 'parsers' useless in parsing through your data for advertising purposes, their main 'cash cow'.

This stands as being a gross conflict of interests and Google has overtly chosen to make profit a higher priority than protecting your privacy.

I give Google a FAIL on their moral ethics and stance on privacy.  

The bottom line?: Don't use Google Drive or Gmail if you don't want your data seen by third parties.  

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Reclaim Your Internet Privacy. Encrypt!

by Dietrich Schmitz

I've written about Retroshare and how to surf anonymously with secure shell in response to the recent outcropping of news flooding the Internet with stories concerning the ongoing practices of our beloved National Security Agency.

There is no shortage of media information and disinformation. You can sort through it and build opinion by consensus across different sources and their relative reliability for giving factual information verses sensationalism.

When it comes right down to it, most everything you do on the Internet is out in the open, or, by explicit or implied consent from you, being shared in some fashion in the name of monetization.

After all, nobody is in business to lose money and if their isn't a good business model for capturing profit then there's no point in being a Capitalist.

In the final analysis, regardless of who you are, what you do on the Internet will be exploited for profit in some fashion as long as there is information to be mined from the stream of data that your activity provides.

To illustrate a point, take Google Drive for instance.

Drive has become a cornerstone of Google's product strategy and the data you store there is in plain human readable clear text. In other words, it is not encrypted.

In fact, Google will not offer a service which encrypts your data.

After all, if your data were encrypted, and you and only you have the private key to unlock it, all of Google's profit from sharing your social activity will cease to exist because they no longer can parse your activity when in an encrypted form. Yes?

This is fundamentally at conflict with your best interests.

I believe that nothing short of your using strong encryption will keep away prying eyes from seeing your personal information.

Encryption is a lock and, when used judiciously, will ensure that your right to privacy on the Internet is upheld even against the NSA.

I have written about how email is fundamentally broken. The government has no interest in it changing since it is clear text and they can read it with impunity and without your knowing along any point it travels across intermediaries to its recipient.

In coming days, I will provide information about what you can do to protect your Internet privacy including useful encryption tools and services.

I hope you will be here to follow along. Remember that encryption is a lock and the only sure fire way you can keep your personal information private--as it should be.

Reclaim your Internet privacy.  Encrypt!

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, June 1, 2013

A Kumbayah Moment: New Ubuntu Community Website

by Dietrich Schmitz

Oh let's join hands now and sing the Coke song or Kumbayah, shall we?  I am feeling so inspired now that (tout d'un coup) a new Ubuntu community website is open.

Isn't that exciting?  What? No?

Agreed.  I mean, why now?  Do you think Canonical Ltd. realize they have a public relations nightmare 'image' problem on their hands?

No, Let's call it major 'damage control'.

And yet, more 'window dressing' being applied slap dab by corporate in a failed effort to prop up a sagging morale.  Don't be anybody's fool.  Take a close look at the picture on the website and you'll see those are Canonical Ltd. employees.

Label this latest move as 'symptomatic' of what I have previously written about: Ubuntu is NOT a Community Project.

It's time for a fork people.  Power to the community, right on.  openUbuntu.  Rise up.

-- Dietrich





Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, May 17, 2013

Emmabuntus: Yet More Recycled Bits?

by Dietrich Schmitz

It's becoming a bit of a joke.  As the pool of Linux Distributions grows, it becomes increasingly diluted by unremarkable Distros which are nowadays easily cloned and, with a 'slap dab' of branding, being trumpeted as innovation.

I can count on one hand the number of Distributions that have a real value proposition today.  The rest are, well, sad to say, redundant and polluting the Linux ecosystem as they turn up like weeds at an alarming rate. (Image credit: bethlehemfields.boydwilson.com)

The newest clone, Emmabuntus, was reviewed in a story entitled Emmabuntus Review - Very Disappointing.   Aside from the obvious hint in the story title, the closing remarks reflect what I consider to be symptomatic with the 'cookie cutter' Distro phenomenon:

"Perhaps this is the first time I write a negative review for a Linux distro but I really dont like Emmabuntus. It is just Xubuntu with a lot of redundant pre-installed applications, which make the distro really bloated. Moreover the developing team is too careless and neglectful, they didnt test and double check anything before releasing the distro. So eventually I removed Emmabuntus after 3 hours."

I am very concerned that the Linux Community doesn't see the potential harm that all of this cloning will produce.

While the GPL allows such activity, it does hurt the image of Linux as outsiders see these efforts with little respect.  In fact, it also creates confusion for the newcomer who will react negatively when confronted with making a decision as to which Distro is best.  And, introducing another copy of a Distro which is laden with bugs increases the possibility of more bugs as it inherits a predecessor's work.

Is this all avoidable?  I don't think so, but I would suggest to the readers that they be vigilant and discerning as they go about selecting which Distro to use.  That is all the more becoming the greater challenge.

I am sorry, but, we don't need more recycled bits.  What we sorely need is real innovation.

Keep your powder dry.

-- Dietrich




Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Systemd: Got Choice?

by Dietrich Schmitz

I've been thinking over the whole systemd issue and have written several stories about it.

It seems to me that somehow a major tenet of Linux has been overlooked:



CHOICE

When exactly did choice go out the window?

I want to know why systemd is not an 'opt-in' configurable option?

Did I miss something?  No, I am afraid I didn't.

No, the whole situation has really been simmering in my mind and as I did more research on systemd, the only conclusion I can reach is that systemd is being foist upon us without a shred of consideration being given to 'choice'.

There is no recognition of or respect given to choice when a Distro simply removes sysvinit or any of the other fine initialization schemes in favor of systemd.

This represents a violation of a major tenet of Linux that I cherish and don't appreciate having simply taken away from me.  Choice is mine.  I can let someone else make a decision for me, or, I can seize control and decide for myself what is best for me.  Someone else has decided that systemd is best for everyone.  Well, guess what?  It isn't.  And you don't have to accept it.  There are still Distros which don't use systemd and some that actually do give you the option to use it.

As far as I am concerned, this is a grievous error and every user should protect their given right to choose what is best for their situation.

Making systemd an opt-in configurable choice should have been given top priority.

If you don't protect your right to choice, who else will?

Today, as a matter of principle, I am taking action on this issue and resolve to do something about it.  Taking choice away is wrong and elitist at best.

I will fill you in later in a follow up story.

-- Dietrich
Enhanced by Zemanta